Dolores Cannon gave
us a very persuasive example of how our bodies have been created
initially, in her book
"THE CONVOLUTED UNIVERSE", BOOK 3, Chapter 28, (p.
DESTRUCTION OF A PLANET
"...D: Why do these people
come to Earth?
S: Well, the Earth is great.
Everything is coming to Earth. Beings from
everywhere are going to put part of themselves on Earth. All over,
every kind of Being is going to be on Earth. Everything. (To himself)
The Earth is hurt too, isn’t it? Yep. The Earth got hurt too.
D: Why are they going to do that?
S: They’re the ones that are
making it happen, or
their idea. They’re in charge of it. They’re
that plan, and they’re
bringing everything to Earth.
They’re bringing things from all over. Everything! All kinds
things. And you know how they do that? It’s with light.
of light. They change strands of light. When they take these little
strands of light, anything can happen. They change everything. It can
make anything happen with it.
D: Where do the strands of light
S: Oh, my gawd! Their minds?
(No, the Strands of Light come
as a Beam from the Portal of the Source of All Life, but only for the
Life of a Universe, this Beam creates Mind-Field. When the Life of Old
Universe is over, the Beam is switched off ! LM)
They take it in their mind and then they
make stuff form. They put a point of light into something and then it
takes shape around it. I knew they were here from a past trip. I
didn’t know them very well. They have a way of creating
They make things. They take light and they make any form out of it. The
light goes in the middle. They can take one cell and change it by
changing the light in the middle. They can make anything different just
by changing the pieces, the part of the light. It’s not what
I’m used to doing, but that’s how they do it. They
things happen that way. This looks like it’s a permanent
here, but they stay away from others. They stay to themselves. In fact,
they take charge of everything, but the others don’t really
D: You said the other ones were
coming to leave parts of themselves,
S: Yes. They’re in charge of who
comes in. They let in
light they want. The light is in everything (Wavy energy is in everyone and
everything on Earth? which make everything to shine! LM).
There are animals on
Earth, and everyone of them has a little piece of light. And if you
change that piece of light, it becomes a different looking animal. So
they can change any animal they want just by changing what’s
the light." Were they using the light to somehow
manipulate or change the DNA?
piece of Light or Spirit they are manipulating for creating a different
animal/human is called "Assemblage Point of the Spirit of a human", see
Carlos Castaneda's Info
D: But you said there were
S: Yes, they’re not like me.
bigger. They’re more solid, too.
D: Are those people from Earth?
S: Yes. The group is working with
that. They’re making them
happen. How do they do that, I don’t know. The bodies came
animals, but the Beings themselves are not animals. The
very animal, so they’re changing them around.
getting bigger and they’re developing more abilities. And
look different, less hair.
D: Do you know if somebody tells
this group to do these things?
S: It looks like they decide what
they’re going to do.
They’re from someplace else, too. They’re on Earth
D: To do the creating. (Yes) And the other one who come
can create, also?
S: I don’t think so. They’re not
that advanced yet.
D: But you said the other groups
come and leave parts of themselves.
S: Oh, yes. They’ll bring a group
of everything, like all the
animals. Every group of animals came from a different place. Like
reptiles came from one place, and mammals came from another place. And
then they take the light and change it. And then the animal changes.
D: So the animals can exist on
S: Oh, yeah! The animals can exist
on Earth. They can make any animal
to fit any condition.
D: That’s what I meant. That part
of the light is in them so
they can stay here and survive.
S: Yes. If they change the light,
the animal changes. They really know
what they’re doing! Wow! They change something inside the
and the cells all change. The ones, that are in charge, are from a
different dimension, than I am. They’re much lighter. And
I’m thinking, that I am lighter, than these creatures, that are
Earth. But I’m not as light as these ones, that are running
show. They’re light. They have enormous energy! They can use
energy. They just take it and manipulate it. More than I can. I
can’t do that. They take this enormous energy and they
it and make different forms. They make a different animal. They make
all sorts of different animals. They can take this stuff out of their
cells, and change it from one animal to the other. And zip! In a matter
of a little time, they have another animal! They are creators...And Mars was too close,
almost as close as it
could get. Darn, if we’d only been on the outer side of the
Sun. We wouldn’t have been wiped out.
D: Was there life on Earth when this happened?
S: Yes, those Beings, that were
the Creators, were there.
creating, and there were all sorts of life, but it wasn’t
that we were compatible with. That’s the trouble, we
weren’t compatible with that life. We didn’t have
bodies, that could live on Earth. We couldn’t live in that
environment. We had our own environment. And as you travel around
everywhere, there are physical bodies. Not everybody has physical
bodies. Physical bodies are dense. And physical bodies are according to
conditions. They can be made any way you want. They can be made to fit
almost any condition on any planet, but not the great big gas planets
like Jupiter. We couldn’t go near Jupiter. It’s too
S: Martians came to Earth. We were all
allowed to come to Earth.
D: In spirit form you mean?
S: No, we obtained bodies. They (the
creators, the advanced Beings, LM) took another monkey, or
it was bigger
than a monkey. It had a different color skin, a yellow skin. If you
start back there, they made all of us genetically compatible.
Isn’t that interesting? They made all of us from different
things. They made the black ones out of gorillas and chimpanzees- they
played with their cells. Their physical characteristics came a lot from
the ape...(but only physical
S: But ours were from a slightly
different monkey. It was medium sized
or smaller. And they took the DNA from that and made it slightly built.
And did something with our little brown almond eyes. And our little,
slighter builds- smaller bodies. And we are the yellow skins. (The
little greys from Mars.) That’s they made us.
was done, that’s where we came in. The Martians found a home
Not right away. It took them a long time. We were
homeless for a long time.
D: But you mean these Creator
Beings (our Higher Selves, LM) were
the ones, that were making the
S: They helped. The Earth itself
had to agree. The planet itself had to
allow it to happen. It had never happened before where one planetary
consciousness shared itself with another. Never happened before. Never!
The Earth decided to share its body with another planetary
consciousness. And this other planetary consciousness were those from
Mars. After these bodies were created, Martian souls came into them. We
was an Advanced Being. Only Advanced Beings could travel.
D: And Sam’s spirit decided to enter a human body on Earth.
S: Yes, we’ve all come back to Earth. We had to come back to
Earth and go back to the 3rd dimension (3rd physical Level of Consciousness,
LM) in physical bodies to learn
more, to advance spiritually back to the 4th and the 5th and the 6th
of my other sessions reported in this book, others have said
the same thing. They normally remained with the Source, etc., and only
came to Earth during the time of major shifts. These were the times
when the most help was needed...
S: Gotta be able to raise a body. It
was done before, but nobody
believes it. Everybody can do it. I have to be able to raise a body.
D: What do you mean?
S: There’s a transformation. I
don’t know exactly
is, I’m still doing it. See, we could get all of our energy
the light. The Universe is full of light, the Universe is all light.
And it’s only in a three dimensional body, that you
get enough light. When you’re in your light body, you can get
enough light so you could live. You always live.
Always, always, always. Light bodies can be put to sleep, but they
generally always live.
D: So it’s difficult to do that in
a physical, solid, dense
S: Yes. Some places, they do it
all the time. Their physical bodies
don’t end, or they have very long lives. But on Earth,
because it’s so negative, so tired, so heavy. And on Earth,
don’t know who you are. You lose your connection when you
Earth. You don’t see your light body when you come to Earth.
don’t know that you are a Light Body. Boy, is it tough to
out too! Wow! On Earth, it’s hard!
- I was supposed to come here. I’m supposed to spiritualize a
body. It’s been done before. And nobody seems to know it. It
be done. Some have done it, by living in the light.
They raised a 3rd
dimension body to the 5th dimension. That’s what they do.
D: But he has been here now in a
physical body living a physical life.
S: Yes, I have. I didn’t have clue
about any more, than that
either, for a long time. I didn’t know a thing. I
really have a clue. I lost all my memories. Really lost my
memories. I can’t believe, that you get upon this planet, and
lose all your memories of who you are."
This is what R.Monroe was writing about in his books. As
you can see, our physical bodies were not created by 'Gods' as all
religious people think, but by highly advanced Beings - our Higher
Selves, who are the higher part of you!
it all Began!
HOLLOW EARTH WEB SITE
(I found a lot of misunderstanding in these writings, I advise the
author to translate and read "Plutonia" to understand things better! LM)
You're welcome to take anything, which you think is useful and put it
the WWW. We've only just started. Is your WWW page about your book or
the Hollow Earth in general or what?
Re: How did I get interested?
My original interest in the Hollow Earth was sparked back in the late
1970's while I was studying the books and prophecies of T Lobsang
Rampa. The main reference is contained in a single chapter in the book
"Twighlight". In it he answers a reader's question and states, that as
far as Tibetans are concerned, the Earth is Hollow and there are people
living inside. The outer crust is 800 - 1000 miles thick and there is a
hole at each pole of approximately 1,400 miles in diameter. Inside live
the REMNANTS of Atlantis, Lemuria and a couple of other civilisations.
They are ruled by a man, whom the Tibetans call: The King of the World.
According to the Tibetans, the Dalai Lama is the Outer World
representative. The Inside contains more land, than sea, and the
population is approximately 800 million. Their flying saucers come out
of the Poles from time to time.
I kinda freaked at the time, because it seemed so unbelievable. Later,
in a library I saw that famous composite photo of the hole as seen from
above. I could find no further books on the subject and let the entire
thing rest. Mentally I simply said "There's perhaps a 10% possibility,
that the Earth is hollow - I'll evaluate it at some later date". And
for well over 10 years I was happy to let it rest. I didn't REALLY
believe, that a hole 1,400 miles in diameter could remain hidden for so
long or go unnoticed in some way and was thus somewhat skeptical about
the whole idea of such a huge entrance. Satellite photos gave nothing
My interest was rekindled late
in 1993 when I was on Compuserve. I was
chatting to a fellow, whom I regarded as one of my very best friends,
and in who's research I had a great deal of faith. His name is Jeff. He
actually kicked the whole subject off and we began talking. True to
form, Jeff had read lots of really OLD stuff about the Hollow Earth,
and brought forth item after item about it. I was very impressed and
that set off an obsession, which has still not ended. What was very sad for me was, that in
spite of Jeff's great knowledge,
he himself actually ended up rejecting the possibility of the Earth
being Hollow. But his objections didn't make much sense to me. He also
suggested, that I do my own thinking on the matter, but from a
mathematical perspective. He said he'd like to see whether I could
mathematically prove/disprove the theory. I accepted the challenge.
Astronomy had always been a favourite subject of mine so I began
thinking about the things I knew about astronomy. I did some reading.
Then I began to realise, that there are some anomalies, which would
For example, back in the 1970's two Soviet
scientists from the
Soviet academy of sciences proposed the theory, that the Moon was a
Hollow Alien Spaceship, placed in orbit around the Earth.
I must digress at this point: Although Jeff rejected the idea of the
Earth being Hollow, he actually accepts the Soviet proposal, that the
Moon may be Hollow - even he admits, that the edvidence for there being
a Hollow Moon is very strong. I had been aware of that book myself back
in the 70's and my own acceptance of the Soviet theory had somewhat
softened my idea to the fact, that perhaps the Earth too was Hollow.
There has often been speculation, even amongst astronomers and
scientists, that Phobos, one of the Moons of Mars may be Hollow. Its
strange orbit is cited as one of the reasons - plus many strange
markings on it and a "huge" crater, which covers about 1/4 of its
surface area. I'd like to point out that Sitchin (12th Planet) is quite
comfortable with the idea, that Phobos is a hollowed out little moon
(about 20 miles in diameter).
As I looked at the numbers I began to realise, that our estimates of
mass are really relative. If all the planets were hollow we wouldn't
really know. It also occurred to me that if Planet X, from which the
asteroid belt had maybe been created, had been Hollow, then its
break-up could be all the more easily explained. For example, if a
planet like the Earth only has a crust and is Hollow Inside, then a big
whack from a large object would cause it to shatter - and pieces would
fly all over the place. If such a planet had been solid, then
would not likely occur. Sure a big chunk could be carved out of it, but
it wouldn't SHATTER. I had noticed too, evidence piling up, proving
beyond any doubt, that comets were merely asteroids with ice/gas and
that they were really one and the same thing. Much of the "missing
mass" of Planet X could also be accounted for if it was hollow. Another
Soviet Cometary specialist has stated, that all existing comets, are
really no more than 100,000 years old. Comets and asteroids are
becoming less. Of course there may be a few, which have great orbital
periods of 10 or 100 thousand years, but the vast majority have been
swallowed up by the Sun, Jupiter, etc.
Another thing worth noting is that there are some flying saucers, which
travel directly from the South Pole along S. America northwards. Some
them move as regularly, as clockwork. I also heard somewhere, that
had a very great number of sightings per capita.
It had always bothered me too: If Atlantis had ever existed, then where
did the people go? Why would such a simple catastrophe have wiped
EVERYONE out? Surely there must be survivors? Why didn't they just go
and live somewhere else?
I also decided, that seismology is a *MUST* to go and have a look at.
And that's what I did. I read up about seismology to see if there was
anything, which might have been misinterpretted and which might
that the Earth was Hollow.
I then discovered why it is they say the
Earth's core is a LIQUID (not liquid but Plasma of Energy of Balance is
in the centre or Sun, though there is ocean water on the surface of
Interiour. LM). The reason is because certain waves can ONLY
travel through SOLID material. These waves can not travel through:
liquids, gases or a vaccum. However, scientists simply "assume" that
the core is a liquid - they do not explore the possibility, that the
core is a gas or even a vaccuum. I also discovered, that approximately
7,000 miles from an earthquake you will find a "shadow" area where
certain types of waves never appear. Could the core/hollow be blocking
out these waves? Then at about 10,000 miles or so these waves reappear.
I also realised the complexity of such waves and how they are reflected
and saw, that it is quite easy to misinterpret them. Later I acquired a
very good seismic modelling program, which runs under windows (and
I'll upload if anyone wants). It is a most excellent program, which
shows how the waves move through the Earth PLUS, what the various
monitoring stations will actually see on their print-outs. As you look
at this you will see, that our methods of watching seismic waves leaves
much to be desired. When waves come up we have no idea where they were
- we really can't tell much.
But look too and you will see a great many
waves bouncing off the "mantle" - we are told this is due to a change
in density. (It makes sense: Density of physical Spheres is higher
towards the centre, but not in the Centre where a combination of a few
Suns is! LM).
Keep in mind, that a Hollow object makes the wave movements
many many times more complex, because waves bounce back and forth
between the Two Thin Crusts and this will complicate the hell out of
the whole thing. And when you look at the seismic model you will see,
that waves are reflected, re-reflected, re-re-reflected and so on. The
Earth sometimes "vibrates" for an hour or two after a big quake.
Probably the BIGGEST argument against the Hollow Earth is a
PSYCHOLOGICAL one. Most people, including myself, just can not believe,
that it could possibly have been missed - or was it?
After Jeff kicked the whole thing off, another friend, Chris, managed
to help me locate a number of old books, written in 1908 and 1913 and
1920. Later I was to learn, that the Hollow Earth debate has been going
on for about 200 years - but previously, prior to 1908, it was a
in which scientists took part.
What killed the debate was when Admiral
Robert Peary claimed in 1908 to have discovered the North Pole.
was really the death knell of the whole idea. In 1914, the Austrians
were going to send an expedition to the North Pole. As part of its
mission they were to check for the Hollow Earth's entrance. They did
this on the strength of a book by an American called: Marshall Gardner.
Gardner wrote one of the best books on the subject ever. It is a 400
page book, of which I have a copy, which contains notes from the
journals of many famous explorers, including Amundsen, Peary, Lt Greely
and many others. Gardner has a patent registered in the USA as the
"discoverer of the Hollow Earth". Gardner pointed out the
inconsistencies in Adm Peary's own log. The fact that only he and an
Eskimo are the only witnesses, that this was the North Pole. The fact,
that on one occassion he wrote, that you struggled like hell to even do
16-20 miles per day through the snow, yet on the last 2 days of his
journey he did a staggering 40+ miles per day.- and so on. How he left
the others of his team behind and they weren't witnesses. Peary had
also made previous claims of discovery on earlier missions and these
had been DISPROVEN. Months before Peary, another American had claimed
to have reached the Pole. His claim was refuted shortly afterwards.
Peary's claim was investigated by the US congress (in 1920 I think) and
TOTALLY REFUTED. Apparently these are public records, which can be
obtained. The US Congress held a hearing and refuted Peary's claims.
Yet, to this day Peary is regarded as the discoverer of the North Pole.
Gardner's studies were detailed - but he wasn't the only one. I later
discovered, that the Smithsonian Institue was originally formed in 1842
to fund an expedition by Lt Wilkes to find the entrance to the Hollow
Earth. Lt Wilkes failed.
What you must understand is this: The poles are not just flattened,
they curve inwards. Now keep in mind, that all navigational methods are
based on the assumption, that the Earth is a sphere. Nowhere on the
of the Earth, except the poles, does the Earth depart from this shape.
Thus navigation works everywhere except there. As you go over the lip
of the entrance and begin the inward descent you think you're on the
other side of the Earth - you are totally unaware, that you are
a huge hole - a hole so big, that the Space shuttle on its highest
orbital level of 750 miles could comfortably fly inside. Although you
can not see the other side, there is a new phenomenon known to all
Polar explorers: The Water sky.
If you look at the sky, it acts like a
mirror and you see BEYOND the horizon. This phenomenon is mentioned by
all Polar explorers. Lt Greely even noticed the shortening of the
horizon. He found he could never see very far. Many many abnormalities
were noted by explorers:
- Warm winds from the north, coloured snow containing huge amounts
of pollens from unknown plants, animals moving NORTH for winter, polar
bears moving north away from their prey, enormous flocks of birds
numbering in the millions (coming from the North), temperatures far
warmer, than expected.
I later discovered that a Polish scientist had calculated the
temperature of the Earth, taking into account latitude as the
determining factor. From 40 degrees north and south the real
temperatures begin to differ from the predicted temperatures.
time we get to the poles we find the poles to be a staggering 30
degrees warmer, than they should be.
Also, during that initial exercise of mine, I studied geomagnetism. I
had never felt comfortable with the "dynamo-in-the-core" theory. The
idea, that currents in the core could create a magnetic field. I have
many reasons for rejecting this idea.
For example, in order for there
to be convection currents in the first place, there have to be
temperature differentials of a big enough degree. Some magma in
the core must be a lot hotter, than the other. This must also imply
sort of cooling process or some process, which keeps one part warmer,
than the other. Without an adequate temperature differential currents
won't arise in the first place. We can rule out cooling, because some
scientists have found, that the Earth is not cooling. But even if we do
have these currents, I still don't see how magnetism is generated.
is not a friend of magnetism. As a substance is heated, so it loses its
magnetism - of course that's not quite an appropriate argument here.
More appropriate is: Can a liquid/semi-liquid generate a magnetic
field? As far as I know this has never been done. ..Surely, a
snails-pace movement is not adequate to generate a magnetic field,
stretches beyond the Moon? Also, why should there be a single focal
point for this magnetic field anyway? The core is rotating along with
the rest of the Earth (Physical
Crusts rotate, but their Suns are always in the cenre and don't rotate,
LM) and non-pysical Layers of Core - there can't possibly be
any friction, in the
same way that the atmosphere rotates with the rest of the Earth. If the
atmosphere did not move along with the Earth we'd have 1,000 mph winds
blowing at the equator - instead, even a 100 mph wind is a great
rarity). I wondered instead, if a nuclear Sun positioned in the core
could be the source of the geomagnetic field. There seemed to be
evidence, which could support this. All lava is slightly radioactive.
Scientists speculate, that the Earth's heat is derived from radium,
decays. (NO, THE HEAT derives from GROWING
INTERNAL SUN, THAT'S CALLED EVOLUTION ! LM).
But hold on: Radium is the lesser brother of Uranium. Decaying
uranium becomes radium. So if there's radium then it might we have been
uranium to start with.
In West Africa there can be found a "natural
nuclear reactor". A place where sufficient uranium occurred naturally
to kick off a nuclear explosion. So I surmised: Wouldn't it be more
logical, during the formation of the Earth for heavy substances like
Gold, Uranium, Lead to have been in the Core instead of iron (the real Core is Sun, the Energy of
Balance, not metal ! LM)? But, you
don't need much Uranium to kick off a nuclear reaction. Also sometimes
these things are self-enriching if enough of it is around. This would
explain why in prehistoric times, huge volcanoes spewed out lava, which
filled entire continents.
(No, it's not so. Volcanos spewed out lava as
a result of New Civilizations entering Earth from all corners of our
Old Universe. They have Sizzling, Electrifying Energy and hit volcanos
with Lightning or Gamma Rays, which start eruption. This way they
preparing a cavern for themselves underneath Volcano. Lava is multiple
layers of our old Holograms. Central Sun is expanding and the Earth has
been expanding, because more and more New
Civilizations turned up on Earth and will be even more! LM).
It would explain why there is evidence of the Earth expanding by 20%...
too, that the Aurora baffles science. That particles similar to those
from the Sun are somehow appearing in the upper atmosphere of the Poles
- but there are far too many of these particles to be accounted for by
the Sun alone. So where do they come from? They come from the Inner Sun
- which is also the source of the Aurora and the light. This also
explains why the Aurora is linked to the geomagnetic field. The
geomagnetic field is not stable. In fact, it wobbles A LOT, and at a
high rate. It moves large distances within short periods of time. This
can be explained by having a Central Sun wobbling around a central
point. In short, I pose this question: If scientists are willing to
accept that decaying radium causes most of the Earth's heat - then does
it take much leap of the imagination to suppose, that just a little bit
more radium/uranium in one point deep within the crust could have
kicked off a self-sustaining nuclear reaction? Even a Sun of as little
as 28 miles in diameter would weigh many millions of tons. It would
hollow out the Earth easily and all the lava would pour out on to the
surface. Later things would cool down inside.
Gravity is an issue all by itself, but rest assured that Newtonian
gravity works like a DREAM even in the Hollow Earth scenario. I have
tested that idea to its fullest.
Eventually, I decided that the evidence, to my way of thinking, was in
favour of the Earth POSSIBLY being hollow. I could see no great
objections to the idea. It would explain many things, which scientists
currently regard as anomalies and which they are HARD PUT TO EXPLAIN.
Since then...my friend
Jeff just fobbed off the best
arguments I put forth. He countered with his own arguments - which to
me did not make much sense. In a nutshell, the main thrust of his
argument was this: If there's this huge hole, then why don't people end
up wandering into it and seeing the Inner world? How can two teams,
crossing the Antarctic, manage to meet at one point?
Answer to the first question:
The hole is very very big. From the Outer lip to the Inside of the
sphere you are looking at a circle (through the crust) with a diameter
of 800 - 1000 miles. To get even half way, you have to travel about
1200 - 1300 miles in a straight line. If you wander even slightly to
one side or the other the journey will become much longer. Also,
compasses tend to go haywire... If you go
in at a skew angle you could walk into the hole, by several hundred
mile and out again, perhaps crossing a distance of a 1000 or more miles
and never once even know, that you were in the hole. This is a feature
of enormous size and larger, than most countries. If you do not
consciously go looking for this hole and taking careful bearing using
the stars (until they disappear), etc you can easily miss the mark.
Question 2: The standard procedure when your compass goes haywire is to
move away from the pole in question (north or south). When your compass
behaves normally you then carry on with your journey. The "north/south
pole" is merely 90 degrees latitude - and since we assume the Earth is
a sphere we assume therefore, that only one spot in each hemisphere can
give us a reading of 90 degrees latitude (by the Sun or any other
heavenly body). The manner, in which 2 teams coming from opposite sides
can meet is simply, because they will be moving away from the rim
whenever the compass goes crazy. It is not to say, that these
expeditions met on a spot marked "X". As they zig-zag around this rim
they will (unknowingly) be moving in a circle and it is easy to see how
they will run into each other. NB: The expeditions in question did not
approach each other directly from 180 degrees, so it is easy to see
that they must meet. If they approached directly from 180 degrees, then
the possibility exists that the one team may go one way round the rim
while the other goes another way round the rim.
Jeff also posed the question: If the US base at McMurdo sound is a mere
400 miles from the Pole, then how come they didn't notice anything? To
me this was a stupid question.
Answer: The US base at the Pole is not "at the Pole". It is on the rim
of the "Area of Inaccessibility". This means, that the South Pole base
is on the rim of a hole 1,400 miles in diameter and you are at least
1,200 miles from the 1/2 way mark going inside. So you can wander 1,000
miles on either side of the South Pole Station and see nothing. McMurdo
Sound is 400 miles further away still. There's no way at a
distance of 1,200+400 miles, that anyone at McMurdo Sound will
see/notice a thing. You
get lost at the Poles - be sure of that. Amundsen, discoverer of
the South Pole, got thoroughly lost near the North Pole. Amundsen's
diaries showed, that he got TOTALLY LOST FOR 6 MONTHS! He tried to go
from Franz Joseph land to Spitsbergen and got totally lost. When he
finally got back to territory he recognised, he was hundreds of miles
from where HE'D CALCULATED HIS POSITION TO BE.
During the BBC documentary "Pole-to-Pole" a number of people including
the BBC crew were on a small plane going across Antarctica. As they
looked out, they made some very telling remarks. One guy said "Gee
isn't it amazing how those old explorers could find their way across
this continent? Just look how flat and featureless it is, no land marks
to go by except the occassional hill. Amazing." He doesn't know how
right he may have been.
And even today its no different. That BBC reporter got his distance
from Tromso, Norway to the North Pole wrong, as did the UPI release for
the distance from Port Barrow to the North Pole.
Cartographers also got it wrong. US Navy cartographers were pissed off
with US Army cartographers, because their maps didn't match. Entire
mountain ranges had to be thrown into the dustbin. Explorer after
explorer discovered islands, mountains, seas, which others couldn't
ever find again. I am
convinced though, that the US Govt, the Russians and maybe a few others
know what's going on there.
The Hollow Earth thing was sad
for me in a way, because Jeff and I
fought about it a great deal, and as far, as I was concerned, he just
wouldn't listen to reason, to independantly acquired facts or anything
else. He shot it down on the basis of a few arguments, which
underestimated the navigational problems. He said, yeah, but the Earth
is flattened at the Poles. Well, that just doesn't match the facts. Go
and look in any book. The Earth's polar diameter is only given as a
mere 26 miles less, than the equatorial diameter. 26 miles in a
of 7926.5 is nothing. If I were to draw a scale drawing of the Earth,
you wouldn't even notice that it wasn't a circle. Anyway, scientists of
old debated the existence of a POLAR BASIN - that the entire Polar
region was DEPRESSED. Some thought it was depressed and others thought
it lead to a hole inside. But that does not explain it all.
while in his ship, The Fram, found himself viewing a Red SUN - the
"Mock Sun" at a time, when the Sun wasn't supposed to be above the
horizon. Many explorers have had a glimpse of the Inner Sun - the "Mock
Sun" - because it appeared in places, where the Sun could not possibly
be (that coinside with what the
team of russian explorers found in Hollow Earth in 1913. This info and
more is in "Plutonia". LM).
In the end, this whole interest of mine probably broke up my friendship
with this guy - which to me was quite a blow. I had another interesting episode,
which also harmed another close
friendship. Another guy I know, who once worked for the NSA, and who
loved photography responded when I told him about the Hollow Earth. He
said he had a photo, which he'd obtained at Goddard Space flight centre
in the 1970's. This photo was of the Earth. He'd borrowed some
negatives and made copies one weekend. When I remarked, that I was
wondering if the Earth was Hollow, he of course turned to his big
colour photo. And there on it he saw the hole - a side view- with
clouds flowing into it. He scanned part of it in black and white and
e-mailed it to me. He'd always been friendly, but warned me not to talk
too much, because the NSA monitors all computer communications. He'd
always said, that making a copy and mailing it to me would be no
problem. As soon as he had a chance (he was the CEO of a company), he
would mail me a copy. But suddenly he began acting weird, when I
him on the issue. Later he more or less disappeared and only resurfaced
at odd times. He behaved in a weird manner, which others noticed
Some of us wondered whether he'd been "silenced".
Later, Dennis Crenshaw also told me, that a similar thing had happened
to a buddy of his, who was making progress with Hollow Earth research.
Dr Laslo Spengler, another researcher I recently met has warned me too
of the subversion of UFO organisations and of the BENEFITS of doing it
alone - doing your research without others peeking over your shoulders.
As I will later show, the same happened to Al Bender back in the 1950's
- and you will see how Al was silenced.
I have long held the opinion, and many will hate me for saying this,
but UFOlogy IS GOING NOWHERE. People are rushing down the wrong path,
watching Area 51, chasing reptilians, looking at crop circles and
trying to catch cattle mutes. No big coverup is needed, because people
are already looking in the wrong place for the wrong thing. Back in the
early days, the researchers were on even ground with the US Govt, but
once the Govt's silencing campaign, in the form of MIBs had succeeded,
the need for silencing became less and less and today they only silence
the VERY FEW, who DARE go against the grain and who dare postulate,
the Earth is hollow and that an advanced civilisation may be on our
doorstep. These few are the only people, who actually stand a chance of
upsetting the cart. I have no doubt, that as one gets closer to the
truth, the US Govt will begin to play rough. Finally, I have only spoken about
The Hollow Earth so far. To me, there are other issues:
1. Subteranean civilisations.
2. Hollow Planets/Moons.
(2) If the Earth is hollow naturally, then we no longer have to buy
into the theory, that the Moon is hollow artificially - it could easily
be a hollow construct naturally. It opens up a whole new field: Where
are all the Aliens, who claimed to come from Venus, Mars, etc? Was
Adamski a liar? Were all the others liars? Maybe NOT! Maybe they were
telling the truth, but because we believe the Planets to be devoid of
life, we think that the Aliens are lying. Perhaps it is that the Aliens
are telling the truth and it is we, who are being lied to by our side.
Let me prioritise some Planets/Moons in order of evidence that they may
6. Callisto(?) (Moon of Saturn)
If other Planets are inhabited, in this Solar System, then many things
in UFOlogy (which didn't make sense before) now begin making A LOT OF
SENSE. For example, you can easily see why Hollow Earthers would get
mighty upset at the thought of 3 superpowers near the poles having a
vast number of nuclear weapons. At the ease with which nuclear attack
submarines like "Scorpion" and "Thresher" can easily sail into their
world underneath through the pack ice and sneak around underwater,
able to instantly launch nuclear missiles, which can blow up their
You can see why Aliens might take a dislike to Russian and American
probes near the planet Mars. You can begin to understand WHY THE US
GOVT MUST ENGAGE IN THIS ENORMOUS COVER-UP.
It opens up a line of thinking and questioning which people have been
ignoring for DECADES.
Re: Subteranean civilisations....
I see Subteranean civilisations as a whole different kettle of fish,
and as a much more difficult subject. It is a subject, which does not
sit comfortably with me. I have read of Richard Shavers, Teros(?) and
Deros... Legends of Leprechauns,
etc may be based on truth, but no real accounts exist of these things
(that I know of)...
The Hollow Earth is a different
concept. There's sunlight,
equatorial temperatures globally, safe from comets, etc. Great stuff.
Its the ideal place to live. Subteranean civilisation - bah humbug.
However, I acquired a very old book: The Coming Race, written in 1871,
by the Rt Hon Lord Lytton. Lytton's story is so amazing, that I can't
believe that UFOlogists haven't dug into it in detail. Here is a man
describing something akin to nuclear power; and giving commentaries on
a wipe out of the surface civilisations - and all this happened back in
1871. There is just so much in that book. But, worse still, while
combing through anomalies I *DO* find evidence, that indeed Lord Lytton
may well be telling the truth. And so I am prepared to consider,
that some races do have little
underground villages, in which they live and come out from - from time
to time. The people Lord Lytton met are known to us today as "The
Mothmen". He predicted, that they would come out and begin looking
around - and they did. The earliest Mothmen sightings I could find were
in 1877 - and they have been seen even in the 1960's. Lytton's book is another, which I'd
like to discuss and go through with
all of you... Lord
Lytton's book is something else altogether! Jan's Definition of the Hollow Earth
From: "Jan Lamprecht"
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 1995
Subject: 1# What do I mean by "Hollow Earth?"
BTW, could you very briefly tell just what you mean by "Hollow Earth"?
I'm not too familiar with the concept and having hard time getting the
over all picture. Personally, I think it's very possible, that there is
a subteranean civilization (probably Atlantis-related)... but, are you
basically saying, that all planets are literally hollow?
Yes, I'm basically thinking along the lines of ALL/MOST Planets/Moons
actually being hollow - like a tennis ball. You could say that I'm
"testing" this hypothesis by looking around at literature, anomalies,
doing some thinking, etc.
I'm still examining the evidence, thinking about the various aspects
and just pondering the whole issue. I like to take my time and think
things through. Sometimes I dawdle on like this for years. Don't be
fooled into thinking, that I haven't had a look at seismology or
or gravity or other issues. I have.
The basic postulate is simply, that the entire Earth is hollowed out.
That most of what we see resembles a tennis ball. There's a
hard/flexible outer shell, which can take meteor impacts - up to a
certain size. But at the Poles there are 2 gigantic holes somewhere
from 800 - 1200 miles in diameter (at their widest point). These huge
Holes can be entered and you can sail or fly or walk all the way into
the interior. Gravity still works as normal, but it holds you "up" the
other way. The Holes are so big, that you don't even know they're there
(except from space).
Thus a ship would sail as normal. Winds would blow and so on. The
atmosphere flows in as well. The atmosphere isn't very thick. 99% of
the atmosphere is contained in the first 30 miles. So if you will
consider a Hole perhaps 1200 miles wide, curving gently inside, through
a crust of 900 miles in thickness, then at the NARROWEST part you will
have a gap of about 300 miles or so. It is quite possible therefore
that in the middle of this hole is a pure vacuum. That "space" as we
know it, exists in the middle of this hole and that as this Hole once
again widens on to the inside, that we find ourselves in a vaccuum in
the centre of the Earth.
(No, there is air to breath there, not
Inside the Earth, like on the outside, will be
oceans, mountains, rivers, continents and atmosphere. But that
atmosphere, like on the outside will be 30 miles high. Now if the
Earth's crust is say 900 miles thick, then we find, that beyond the
inner atmosphere is a vaccuum of: 7900 - 900 - 900 - 30 - 30 = 6040
miles in diameter. That would be big
enough to fit the Moon into it. The Moon being only 2160 miles in
diameter. But no, there's no moon inside.
Although a fellow by the name
of Symmes (fearless captain), postulated, that inside the Earth was
another Earth and
another (5 or 8 levels within each other). But Symmes was somewhat
What I'm talking about is much simpler - the same thing, that
Olaf Jansen says he saw and the same thing the Tibetans talk of. That
inside we have a world, which is exactly the same as on the outside. In
this Inner vaccuum, is a little Sun...
A compass on a ship on the outside would
point towards the North. As you get closer to the hole, the compass
would begin pointing DOWN. If you don't physically adjust your compass
down then it might begin spinning around. As you go deeper into the
hole and reach the inner surface you would find your compass returning
to normal again. It would still point "north" but that would now be
The Earth's motion through space is not perfectly constant. In fact the
Earth speeds up and slows down in its motion. Thus our little Inner Sun
would wobble around (like a passenger in a bus).
But how would the Inner Sun stay in the centre and not crash to the
side? Well, this is where I can point to a most "bizarre" connection
with that book "My contact with Flying Saucers". (Its not about the
Hollow Earth, but its about physics - Alien style). The Alien Captain
tells us about the repulsion of light. What is interesting is that the
theory of gravity alone would be unable to account for a Central Sun
holding its position. The Central Sun would move - inevitably - because
of the Earth changing its speed and direction. Gravity as we know it
would cause the Central Sun to crash into the side of the Earth. The
moment the Central Sun moved even a little to one side, gravity from
the closest side would draw it to the wall and the Central Sun would
crash into the side. But, the Alien Captain explained a great deal
about the pressure of light. Since this Central Sun emits light, the
light would of course push against the Earth. So let's say the Earth
slows down a little.
The Central Sun should come crashing into the
side. Well, in this case as it comes closer to one side, the pressure
of light - due to its nearness, would push harder on the Earth and
impart a bit more momentum to it. This is negligible really.
importantly, the light of the Sun would be reflected back onto the Sun
itself thereby pushing it back.
The Central Sun would thus wobble back
and forth and move around in sympathy to changes in the speed and
direction of the motion of the Earth. Light from the Inner Earth would
shine out through the Holes. But since
the Holes are really very tiny, it would not happen often. Note the
Maedler phenomenon I mentioned with regard to Venus? That only on 2
occassions so far: 1686 and 1833, have astronomers observed light
shining out of both Venus's Poles. At other times, the light shining
out would be indirect light and it would form the Aurora.
(The various Color Vibrations of
different civilizations inside Earth, would cause Auroras to turn up
through the Holes! LM).
The Aurora chops and changes and to a certain extent moves and behaves
in sympathy with the Earth's magnetic field and the emissions from the
Central Sun...The problem they, scientists, found
was, that the
Sun could NOT be the cause of the Aurora. The problem being that we do
not receive enough particles from the Sun in the upper atmosphere of
the Earth to cause the Aurora. Their calculations show that there are
more "sun-like" particles up there in the atmosphere at the
there should be by the action of the Sun alone. So they are stumped...
One could ask oneself many questions about conventional Aurora theory.
Like: Why are auroras only around the poles? Why aren't there more
over the place? Why only the poles?
That Central Sun also produces heat. And if we have winds blowing in
and out from the Inner Earth to the Outer Earth, then we should have
some sort of heat exchange. The same is true of water. Note those
Antarctic pollyanas I spoke about.
In the early days of Arctic exploration scientists calculated the
expected temperatures for the latitudes as explorers moved north.
Invariably they found, that northern latitudes were far warmer, than
should be if heat from the Sun alone was the source. I have come across
calculations done a few decades ago by a Polish scientist in this
regard. His calculations of the Earth's temperature show, that the
temperatures at the poles are 30 degrees warmer, than they should be.
our scientists then say that it is warm equatorial air warming the
poles. But does that really make sense? Is there really enough
equatorial air going far enough to the poles and retaining its heat
long enough to keep them 30 degrees warmer?
I often wonder if air exchange may cause havoc with all those
super-computers, which are calculating next week's weather!
Where on the Earth would you expect to find the most fish? Believe it
or not, the Polar regions have a greater density of fish life, than the
equator and warmer areas. Fish have a type of anti-freeze in their
blood. But that does not explain why they should thrive more in such
regions. Or is it that fish from the Inner Earth - where the people do
not fish as much as we do - spill over and swim out of the holes?
The same is true of bird life. There are accounts too of bears and
other creatures in the Arctic going NORTH for winter.
There really are a lot of issues to look at. But there are enough
strange things, which makes one wonder. The pattern which I have
stumbled across - and only really appreciated fully recently - is that
most types of Fortean phenomenon are related to the Hollow
Earth/planets or Subteranean issues in one way or another. It seems to
me that Forteana - if nothing else - is pointing the way. I never
One thing, which I found interesting, was that scientists have
to find the "centre" of the Earth's magnetic field. They found it was
82 miles off centre. But that's not the whole story. The Earth's
magnetic field does not just gradually move westwards as we are told.
From what I've read, the Earth's magnetic field actually moves in a
jagged orbit of approximately 30 miles PER DAY. As the Earth
rotates daily, and the Inner sun wobbles, this wobble is traced out as
a jagged ellipse DAILY. This - if nothing else - should clearly show,
that this could not possibly be caused by currents. It shows, that at
any one moment, the position of the centre of the magnetic field is at
a certain spot INDEPENDANT of the Earth's physical position. I have
many problems with ALL convection current theories in the Earth. I do
not believe any of them. I have a particular argument dealing with
convection currents in the Core, plus the fact that gravity will grow
less and less as you get closer to the centre of the earth (assuming
I have tried to get more data
regarding the motion of the Earth's
magnetic field. But, because I'm not in the USA I do not have access to
the USGS magnetic data BBS. However I think it is worth studying. If one could study the correlation
between the movement of the Earth in
space, its rotation and that magnetic centre - you might just be able
to prove that the Earth's magnetic field is being generated by a
specific body. Did you
know that when atom bombs are exploded - that there is an Aurora in
that area for several days afterwards? That proves: Aurora can be produced in latitudes
other, than the Poles.
This brings us to the formation of the Earth. Geologists have
discovered, that the Earth is not really cooling down, but that it
generates its own heat.
Immediately it would melt the surrounding rock, produce
enormous temperatures and soon immense quakes would shake the earth and
enormous volcanoes would spew forth lava. Huge amounts which would form
the first continents. As it melts everything around it, eventually,
this wobbling nuclear reaction would hollow out the Earth...This would
leave the entire Earth's crust honeycombed with
large caverns and tunnels - in which subteranean life could exist at a
future time. Later when things cool down, and a vaccum forms inside,
water and air could be sucked inside. This is all very hypothetical and
scanty... It is truly a
fascinating subject, and the mere thought of Hollow worlds is quite
exciting. Was the
"Garden of Eden" inside the Earth? Well, Olaf Jansen - who claims to
have gone there emphatically says Yes!
Could it be that "normal" life is actually intended INSIDE worlds.
Could we be the "abnormal?" I say this because if one overcomes the
idea of a Central Sun - then you immediately see many advantages in
that sort of idea. I have done some basic calculations and a Central
Sun of 28 miles in diameter would present the same size in the sky as
our Sun does. If its luminosity is in similar proportion, then that
would be enough to light up and warm up such a world. Now think about this: Comets and
meteors can destroy life. But, they
can not harm any life at all which exists below the Crust. The impact
of even a small object 100 miles across could probably destroy all life
on Earth. And an object 100 miles across - in space - is nothing - its
like a spec of dust. Yet, even such an impact would have almost no
effect on life on the Inside. It might produce an earthquake at best.
Think too of climate. Here we live on the outside.
Latitude=temperature. Go a little north and you get cold. Go to the
equator and you get warm. Then you have day and night too. But, inside
a globe, ALL POINTS are equidistant from that Sun. You could have an
entire world with all of it having a tropical climate. Isn't this more
sensible? Isn't this more conducive to life perhaps?
There is an interesting idea, which the Buddhists have. They believe in
cycles. In regular Earth changes, quakes - the ends of Ages. They
believe, that the Earth is a special place, a School. Just a few weeks ago I mentioned that
other book about UFO contact from
Under the sea. There, Aliens also spoke of regular pole shifts and
Alien peoples coming from far and wide to watch, study and help us
through this catastrophic thing. But wait a minute! What about THEM? If
they live as we do, then surely it should be happening to them too
(since many of them are human and live under similar conditions). Why
don't THEY have Pole shifts? Why aren't they afflicted by Earth
changes? WHAT IS SO SPECIAL ABOUT US THAT EVERYONE SEES US AS A SORT OF
I have an idea - its a bizarre idea - but could it be that WE are among
the very few, who live on the OUTSIDE of our world? That our world is
special - not because it has life - but because it has life on the
Inside AND the Outside. Could that be the secret?
(Not quite. All Civilizations of our Old Universe are gathering and
have a unique Human experience here on Earth, like nowhere else! LM).
Have a look around. Whether you read about spiritulism, reincarnation,
buddhism, UFOs...whatever. There is ONE THEME, that keeps coming back
us over and over. It goes thus:
(a) There is life on many many Planets. Many are Earth like.
(b) Earth is a SCHOOL, Earth is DIFFERENT from other Planets.
(c) Life on Earth gets wiped out regularly.
(d) Why are so many civilisations out there, which do NOT seem to be
wiped out regularly?
The question I keep asking is: Why? What should make Earth different
from other places? This bizarre answer is most intruiging. Could it be
that *WE* have our entire point of view REVERSED from the NORM in the
Universe, because we live on the Outside? Thus when we go searching for
life, we look only on the outside. So we see bare worlds - deserts and
we say to ourselves that *WE* are the only life. YET, perhaps these
same desert Worlds have great civilisations inside their hollowed out
interiors. But we just don't recognise it?
I want to point you to a bizarre coincidence which occurred in our
group (the UFO/Prophecy group) many weeks ago. The significance of it
will not have struck either you or most of the others at that
time. So let me refresh your memory.
Tarabich had predicted (over 100
years ago) that we would go into space and all we would find there
would be DESERT WORLDS. We would search but find no life. Then, much
would FIND LIFE on those same Worlds, because we would understand
something, which we didn't understand before.
(No, because our vibration will be higher! LM).
predicting HOLLOW WORLDS? It's
worth thinking about.
Oh yes, I nearly forgot something. You mentioned "remnants of Atlantis"
living underground. This brings me to another interesting point.
Imagine a continent/island of very advanced people with space ships,
etc. Quakes rock the place. Now what's stopping them from evacuating
and going to live ELSEWHERE on the Earth? Why should most of those
people die from something as innocuous, as some quakes? Why can't there
be enough SURVIVORS enough to
start new cities elsewhere? Not even in a nuclear war will you find
EVERYONE dying. Apart
from them flying to another Planet (which would seem pretty much
- wouldn't it seem more likely that they found a much nicer place to
Why live in underground tunnels and caverns when you can live on
the surface in the sunshine? Why didn't they pick out the most
beautiful place on the rest of the Earth and MOVE THERE? There must
have been plenty of places to go.
Or is it, that they knew of a place,
which IS nicer than anywhere on the surface and that they DID go there?
And that may be where they are living today - in the Inner Earth -
along with survivors from Lemuria, Mu and all the other civilisation?
Life on Earth thus works like this:
(a) New colonies of humans/beings are seeded on the surface after a
(b) If they develop enough and survive long enough to see it through to
the next pole shift and all their cities are destroyed, then they move
inside the Earth, where things are much safer. If they have figured
that the Earth is Hollow and they have the technology to move.
(c) Go back for the next Class.
This is a "conspiracy" on the part of Higher Beings and this is
what "graduation" from the School of Planet Earth is all about. We get
stuck here on the Outer Earth and we have to figure things out for
ourselves. We begin as barbarians and savages and see if we can make it
to eventually qualify for membership of a greater order in the
Kinda weird eh?
There's something which I think you might not have come across,
is the series of books written by Don Wilson. He wrote a book about a
theory postulated by Soviet Scientists in the mid 1970's wherein they
reckoned that our Moon was hollowed out - a spaceship in fact. There's
actually tons of evidence for that. The Moon is a very strange place.
It was not always there. The Soviets showed, that the Moon has a very
tough outer skin and all craters are very shallow REGARDLESS of the
width of the meteor, which struck and formed them. The *ONLY* exception
is this newly photographed crater at the Moon's South Pole. It is much
deeper, than any of the other craters. The average density of the Moon
is the same as aluminium and you know how light that is...All sorts of
clouds have come out from the Moon. Many of the anomalies on the Moon
have been documented by astronomers and are known as TLPs. I found the
arguments for the Hollow Moon to be extremely strong. I can't see how
anyone can think otherwise once you've gone through the data. The
seismic data is extremely impressive too, because it had scientists
literally falling off their chairs when the first seismic information
was in. There was also an analysis done by a scientist at NASA in 1962
wherein he concluded that the Moon must be hollow. What is interesting - and you should
keep this in mind - is that if one
object is hollow, then it is likely that most everything else might be
too. In Astronomy, MASS is dealt with on the basis of RELATIVE masses.
So if the Moon is Hollow, then so could the Earth and everything else
be - because GRAVITY (our gravity) is based on masses - relative masses
If only one object was Hollow, then it would stand out
like a sore thumb. But what if they all were? Polar anomalies on different planets
in the Solar System? Did you see that ZIP file of photos?
For a long time I have been
intrigued by the concept of the Hollow
Earth. I remember reading Raymond Bernard's book on the subject ( The
Hollow Earth - 1979 ) in the mid 1980's and felt a strong affinity for
the whole idea. Next, I read a strange book called "Etidorhpa" by John
Uri Llyod written in the late 1890's about a person, who traveled from
the Outer Surface to the Inner Surface of the Earth and carrying when
he arrived at the center of the Earth crust.
According to Mr. Bernard (see diagram above) our world is Hollow, with
the Crust of the earth being 800 miles thick. There exists two openings
at the North and South Pole, each hole having a circumference of 1400
At the center of the Earth is not a molten
core, but an Inner Sun, which is six hundred miles wide and is 2900
miles from the
The diameter of the lip at the Opening at the poles is
1200 miles long, thus a person can not see the other side of the
Therefore, there exists three Worlds on our Planet, the outer surface,
where we live, the middle Earth, which purportedly is lined with many
caverns, tunnels (made by someone), Inner Cities and people who live
there and lastly the Inner Surface. How Gravity works then is the
following. For the people, who live on the outer surface, Gravity holds
them down. For the people that live in the middle earth, the closer
they get to the center of the crust (i.e. - 400 miles down), the less
effect gravity will have upon them.
In the book, "Etidorhpa", when this
individual traveling down into the Earth reached the center of gravity,
i.e. where there is no gravity --- he was able to move by the power of
his mind, his heart stop beating and he didn't need to eat.
described gigantic vegetation, that lives under the Earth as this
pull of gravity allows things to grow larger. Lastly for the people,
live on the inner surface, they would also feel gravity pull on them to
walk on this surface, but since there is an Inner Sun, they would have
24 hours a day.
There is supposedly land masses and water bodies, that
exist on the Inner Earth, the same as the outer surface, except the
vibration and energy in the Inner Earth is more pure and of a higher
vibrational frequency (some say a 4th dimensional frequency).
For people, who have claimed to travel to the Inner Earth, they state,
that the people they encounter in this region, are usually very tall.
Some other individuals have speculated, that descendants of Atlantis
Lemuria live in this Inner Utopia and therefore they are thousands of
years ahead of us technologically and spiritually. Some others say,
possibly the Mayans may have gone into this location as well, to
explain where they disappeared.
Again, according to our channeler
Michael Kant, he claims that 12 galactic races came to our Earth long
ago and created their first city underground in the 4 Corners area.
Each race brought with them a crystal skull and body, which contained
the gentic coding of their race and cosmic knowledge. Six tribes
decided to stay on the surface of the Earth and Six tribes went into
the Inner Earth. Now all twelve tribe exist in the Inner Earth. It is
also believed, that other Extraterrestrial races may have bases in the
Inner Earth as well. Michael describes in our book being taken by a
Pleiadian Space Ship and given a tour of the Inner Earth.
In 1982, while traveling on faith throughout the western part of the
U.S., I had the fortune to meet Ed Palmer in Portland, Oregon, who is
the founder of the Cosmic Science Research Center. Ed told us a very
strange tale about how he was an exchange baby, that he was originally
from Orion, but when he was very small, the true Ed Palmer was
for him. He claimed, that when he has had a physical examination, that
there are some differences in his body and also that he has some type
of mental plate in his head, in which if a UFO comes close, he hears a
buzzing sound. Even though Ed was in his 70's or 80's, he definitely
had more energy and excitement of life than I at this time (being 27).
In any case, Ed gave us a pamphlet, that he shared with others, about
Hollow Earth. In this pamphlet it said, that all Planets are Hollow (in
Bernard's book, Mr. Bernard explains, that what appears to be the pole
cap we see of Mars, is actually the light of Mar's Inner Sun shining
out of the pole. Furthermore Bernard states, that the Aurora Borealis,
that is only visible up north, is the reflection of the Inner Sun off
clouds passing over the Opening of the Pole. Also, that some explorers
of the North Pole have discovered: the closer they get to the Pole, the
warmer it gets instead of the colder. Could the Mammoths discovered
frozen in Siberia with fresh food in their mouth be actually Mammoths,
that live in the Inner Earth, which has a warmer climate, and somehow
got lost and wondered into the outer surface and that
Ed even had a
ride on a UFO to the moon which is hollow and that the ETs use the moon
to construct spacecraft inside, hidden from our prying eyes. Ed
explains, that when a Planet is formed it is first just gas, which is
rotating. He said, that the heavy particles eventually expand out and
create the planet's surface and the
lighter particles contract to form
the Central Sun.
(This is not right. Sun is a
Higher Being, full of White Energy of Balance, a Huge Soul and you
treat it like an object, made of particles! LM).
Another connection with the
Inner Earth relates to Admiral Byrd. It is
purported, that when the Admiral went to explore the North Pole, that
actually entered into the Inner Earth at the Opening at this pole.
Included below, you will see a purported diary by Admiral Byrd, that
discusses he made contact with an advanced people in this area, who
showed him their world and asked for him to take a message back to the
surface dwellers and government of their concern about a future vision
they had of our destroying our world and since this is their home as
well, they of course wanted to prevent this. If such a people do exist,
it is theorized that possibly some of the UFOs we see are not
extraterrestrial but intraterrestials. It would require a spacecraft,
that can negate the force of
gravity to fly out of the Polar Openings as gravity would pull any
boat or airplane to follow the outer-to-inner surface. Another
spiritual channel we have been in communication with is Christine Hayes
of the Star of Isis Foundation in San Antonio, Texas. She claims to be
receiving telepathic information from the people, who live in the Inner
Lastly, a good source on Internet for Hollow Earth related information
is the mailing list created by Jan Lamprecht of South Africa. She has
been fascinated with the Hollow Earth for a long time. If you would
like to join her mailing list, she can be contacted at email address:
email@example.com. Below is a list of information we have been given
permission to share which comes from the mailing list (we added some
entries from our files to the resource section):
Hollow Earth Resources
Attn: Gene Du Plantier
17 Shetland St
Willowdale, Ontario M2M 1X5
The Hollow Earth Insider
Attn: Dennis Crenshaw
P O Box 918
Yulee, FL 32097
Tel: (904) 225-9181
Fax: (904) 225-2858
Attn: Mary Davis
Aurora, CO 80040
(Hollow Earth study group)
Attn: Dan Weiss
P O Box 890
Felton, CA 95018
Tel: (408) 335-9329.
c/o Star of Isis Foundation
Attn: Christine Hayes
P.O. Box 4872
San Antonio, TX 78285
(Channel for Thoth and Inner Earth Beings,shares information
about Inner Earth Tribes connection with ancient Crystal Skulls)
Beckley, Timothy Green
SUBTERRANEAN WORLDS INSIDE EARTH,
THE SMOKY GOD AND OTHER INNER EARTH MYSTERIES
(Sky Books, Box 769, Westbury, NY 11590)
FLYING SAUCERS FROM THE EARTH'S INTERIOR
THE HOLLOW EARTH, New York, Bell, 1979
(Contact: Health Research, Box 70, Mokelumne Hill, CA 95245)
Byrd, Admiral Richard, THE FLIGHT TO THE LAND BEYOND THE NORTH POLE
(Hollow Earth Society, Attn: Captain Wilhelm Shoush, POB 142, Stanford,
Gardner, Marshall, A JOURNEY TO THE EARTH'S INTERIOR, (1920)
Health Research, Box 70, Mokelumne Hill, CA 95245)
(Health Research has the best selection of Hollow Earth books)
Inner Light, Attn: Tim Beckely, POB 753, New Brunswick, NJ 08903;
(Publisher of UFO/Hollow Earth books)
Jansens, Olaf, THE SMOKEY GOD
(One of the books is about Dr Kane, an American, and his Polar
expeditions in the 1850's. What amazed me were the continual references
to the Open Polar Sea! Remember Sir John Franklin who got lost trying
to find the NW Passage? He too believed in an open polar sea. Dr Kane
who was sent to search for him believed that Franklin might have ended
up in the Open Polar Sea! There are a number of accounts in the book of
explorers seeing this open ocean at latitude 81-82 degrees north.
- There were references to the many emminent Geographers who predicted
the existence of this Open Polar Ocean.
- Even more amazing was a map - which I will scan for you. It is a map
of Smith Sound. The stretch of Ocean between Greenland and the
USA/Canada. It is a map compiled by Dr Kane as commander of "The Second
American Grinnell Expedition". This map shows as they proceeded up
Smith Sound, a line of ice at just above 80 degrees latitude. Then as
they proceeded further north at about 81-82 degrees, they spotted an
Open Polar Sea! It is all on this map.
- There is even a letter in this book, from the Secretary of the US
Navy, to Lt Kane, instructing him to check out the reports of this Open
- What amazes me, is the continual mention of the number of emminent
explorers and scientists of that time who either reported this open
polar ocean, or who believed in its existence. There are also continual
references to the Polar Basin - the description of which as I pointed
out in a prior e-mail is of the Ocean being lower than the surrounding
land - an impossibility IMHO..... Jan)
Lloyd, John Uri, ETIDORPHA - Or the End of the Earth
Pocket Books, NY, NY 1974
(original manuscript written in 1894)
Online Book Catalog: http://illuminet.com/~ron/inet.html
(may have some Hollow Earth books you can buy)
Pawels, Louis & Bergier, Jacques, THE MORNING OF THE MAGICIANS
THE PHANTOM OF THE POLES, (1908)
Rudder, Lena Ellen
(Tema Press, POB 14762, Ft. Worth, TX 76117; (817) 831-2586
- author of a book about the Hollow Earth)
Wilson, Don, OUR MYSTERIOUS SPACESHIP MOON, (Hollow Moon)
Sources of Information:
Jan Lamprecht" firstname.lastname@example.org
Steve Wingate email@example.com
Joshua Shapiro CrystalSkullExplorers@gmail.com
From: "Jan Lamprecht"
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 1995 14:43:22 +0200
Subject: 1# Admiral Byrd's grandson interviewed on radio here
I listened Thursday night to Harley Byrd, the Admiral's alleged
grandson. It was quite strange, because he claims to have his
grandfather's secret diaries. This is what he claims: Basically, when
Admiral Byrd was on his way back from his first North polar flight
(somewhere not far from Iceland), he spotted a vast city. This, the
Admiral writes, "is impossible." The city was not a human city,
however. Soon Adm. Byrd was approached by strange aircraft and forced
to land. He walked through the alien city, and was led into a hall.
There, according to Harley Byrd, the Admiral saw all manner of
creatures: - Sasquatch, large and small greys, but mostly "Aryans," who
were human and blond. (They had swastikas painted on their flying
discs.) One of the members of the Admiral's expedition was German, and
evidently took careful notes. As it happens, Harley Byrd is passing out
a similar satellite photo as the one you have, and insists it shows a
polar opening. (I have not seen it.)
I listened to this "alleged" Harley Byrd character for nearly two
hours, and my conclusion is that he's a fraud. He talks nonsense, makes
all manner of bizarre claims about greys, sasquatch, Aryans, and other
alien types, and assiduously commercializes the whole for profit. It
has been stated by someone here in California that Harley Byrd is
actually a Jewish huckster whose name ends in "itz," and merely poses
as Byrd's grandson to sell these bogus diaries.
Curiously, Harley Byrd admits to being a former military intelligence
officer who now works in Hollywood (on TV production and as an actor).
Byrd insists on being called "Dr. Byrd," though given his activities it
is not clear what his doctorate is for. He is close friends with Dr.
Frank Stranges, author of *The Stranger at the Pentagon*, another wild
yarn about a Venusian who had an office there. Stranges is another one
who peddles the hollow earth line.
American 'South Pole' Program in
Arctic Circle Helicopters
Antarctic Lake Vostok! Pinguins of
Layer around Earth!
Camps in Arctica!
skies of Antarctica!
South Pole, American Program