Fears piracy
case could cut web access
(Don't believe all
these fear
generating articles! If your website is educational and not money
making tool, then you would not need to worry about. Internet is the
Final Merging of Different Energies Worldwide before the Planetary
Shift of Consciousness and this is the reason why all the fences/'laws'
are in the process of being broken, LM).
http://bigpondnews.com/articles/Technology/2010/01/31/Fears_piracy_case_could_cut_web_access_423360.html
Australian internet rights groups fear a piracy court case could force
ISPs to become 'copyright cops' and cut web access to customers who
illegally download.
The Federal Court is on Thursday expected to hand down its judgement in
the case, which has pitted Hollywood and Australian film and TV
producers against Australia's third-largest internet provider, iiNet.
The entertainment companies, which include Village Roadshow, Paramount
Pictures Australia and Twentieth Century Fox International, say iiNet
has not done enough to stop its customers illegally sharing movies on
the net.
But iiNet argues it has never encouraged or authorised the illegal
sharing or downloading of files in breach of copyright laws and
specifically warned its users against doing so.
Electronic Frontiers Australia, which aims to protect the civil
liberties of internet users, said the case goes further than any other
similar case seen around the world in holding an ISP responsible for a
customer's illegal activities.
'It doesn't seem to be a paradigm that we are used to seeing in the
rest of offline life,' spokesman Geordie Guy told AFP.
'We've never seen a company which supplies electricity held responsible
for supplying electricity to a house which grows illicit drugs, for
example.'
The case hinges on more than 94,000 alleged infringements on the iiNet
network over 59 weeks from June 2008, involving titles such as Batman
Begins and Dark Knight.
The consortium of 34 Australian and US media content providers sent
iiNet notifications of the infringements but say nothing was done about
them.
The Australian Digital Alliance (ADA), which is pushing for
intellectual property law reform, fears that if iiNet loses it could
set a precedent leaving ISPs no choice but to terminate the access of
internet users accused of making illegal downloads without each case
coming to court.
The term intellectual property refers to areas such as copyright,
designs, and patents, confidential information and trademarks.
'The ADA believes that access to essential services, such as the
internet, should not be terminated without the fundamental protection
of independent judicial oversight,' the alliance's Matt Dawes said.
Dawes said ISPs were under mounting pressure to regulate the activities
of those who subscribe to their internet services.
'The strategy of compelling ISPs to act as 'copyright cops' enforcing
private rights is a last-ditch response to the difficulties of
preventing file-sharing,' he said.
BitTorrent websites were hard to shut down,, while individual
file-sharers were too numerous to sue, added Dawes.
BitTorrent is a technology that allows online users to share parts of a
large file such as a film or song over the internet. The parts are then
stitched together on the end user's computer to create a complete file.
The chief executive of iiNet, Michael Malone, agreed in court that half
or more than half of traffic by volume across the company's network was
BitTorrent traffic, and that the technology was frequently used to
illegally download movies and TV shows.
'Placing responsibility for reducing file-sharing on ISPs is
inappropriate because it will shift the cost of copyright enforcement
on to customers and has great potential for abuse without proper
supervision,' Dawes said.
Whatever the court decides, there was likely to be legislative action
in Australia to clarify how ISPs should implement a policy to terminate
repeat copyright offenders, Dawes said.
David Crafti, who heads the recently formed Pirate Party Australia,
which wants intellectual property law reforms, says the case could open
up issues of privacy if ISPs were essentially expected to spy on their
customers.
'In order to enforce copyright laws strictly, the problem is that
nowadays what's actually required is invasions of privacy which are
actually anathema to a free society,' he said.
Crafti said MPs had been slow to respond to the enormous changes
brought about by the internet and needed to recognise there was
currently no way to prevent illegal downloading without taking
draconian measures.
'The way I see it, the internet is a utility. It should be on tap like
water. And as soon as you start limiting that, you are limiting the
freedom of your society,' he said.
Sunday, January 31, 2010 » 04:52pm
Fans weigh in
on Apple's iPad
http://bigpondnews.com/articles/Technology/2010/01/29/Fans_weigh_in_on_Apples_iPad_422489.html
Critics and fans have weighed in after Apple unveiled its iPad tablet
computer, with opinion divided on whether the iconic California company
had given birth to another game-changing product.
While some technology analysts predict the iPad will be the
best-selling electronics device of 2010, others complain it has no
camera or USB port, can't multitask, can't be used as a phone and
doesn't support Adobe Flash.
Unveiling the new touchscreen device on Wednesday, Apple chief
executive Steve Jobs admitted he was taking a gamble by trying to carve
out an entirely new device category between the laptop computer and the
smartphone.
'We think we've got the goods,' Jobs said. 'We think we've done it.'
Wall Street was uncertain. After gaining nearly one per cent on
Wednesday, Apple shares were trading about 3.5 per cent lower at midday
on Thursday, occasionally dipping below $US200.
A number of analysts described the iPad as a potentially powerful rival
to Amazon's Kindle electronic book reader, but shares in the online
retail giant were up nearly one per cent at midday after gaining 2.7
per cent on Wednesday.
Although consumers will have the final say, technology analysts and
gadget reviewers were mixed on whether the iPad will be a smash hit
like the iPod, which controls over 70 per cent of the market for MP3
players, or the iPhone, which completely transformed the smartphone
arena.
Samuel Axon of tech blog Mashable was among those in the disappointed
camp.
'The iPad isn't the transformational device so many Apple enthusiasts
were hoping for,' Axon wrote. 'It won't turn all the content industries
upside down, it won't be your primary computing device and it's not
even a bigger, better iPhone.'
Michael Hiltzik, a technology columnist for the Los Angeles Times,
said: 'The iPad resembles a scaled-up iPhone -- without the phone.'
The tech blog of Germany's Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung said after
months of pre-launch hype, 'expectations for the new Apple product were
so high they were difficult to fulfil'.
'In its current form, there are too few advantages compared with a
notebook or a smartphone,' it said, asking whether consumers would be
ready to pay to read newspapers on the iPad when they can get the same
content online for free.
John Ridding, chief executive of Britain's Financial Times, one of the
few newspapers to charge readers online, hopes they will.
'Apple's new iPad is a welcome innovation, providing another important
channel for publishers,' Ridding said.
'We hope this launch marks a significant new step in the evolution of
portable digital devices, providing a richer user experience and giving
the FT the ability to deliver more interactive and dynamic content to
our customers.'
Spain's El Pais said the iPad opens up a new avenue for content
creators struggling to adapt to the digital era. 'The real revolution
will not be technological but cultural and entrepreneurial,' it said.
'Books, videogames, movies, maps, newspapers and television shows will
be distributed through the iPad,' it said.
'News publishers, movie studios, music labels and software developers
have a unique opportunity to reinvent their sector,' El Pais said.
Om Malik of tech blog GigaOm said the iPad is 'made for the consumption
of digital media: games, music, photos, videos, magazines, newspapers
and e-books.
'The iPad's primary purpose is to help you consume the ever-expanding
amount of digital content on offer,' he said, calling it the 'ideal
device for today's world'.
Claudine Beaumont, technology writer for Britain's Daily Telegraph,
hailed the sleekness of the iPad, its reading software and virtual
keyboard.
'It won't replace your laptop, but I think it may have sounded the
death knell for notebook computers,' she wrote.
MG Siegler of tech blog TechCrunch, after playing with the iPad,
pronounced it 'beautiful and fast'.
'It felt like I was holding the future,' Siegler said, adding that
while it may not be a 'must-have' device for many people right now it
would appeal to the 75 million iPod Touch and iPhone users, something
Apple CEO Jobs also alluded to in his speech.
'And as that user base keeps expanding, so too will the base of those
that are interested in the iPad - many just don't know it yet,' Siegler
said.
Users eager to judge for themselves will have to wait two months before
the first iPads are shipped worldwide at an entry-level price of $US499
($A560).
Friday, January 29, 2010 » 10:27am